Project Management
Project Management Testing Methodology
How we evaluate project management, task tracking, and team collaboration tools.
← Back to Methodology HubThe 100-Point Scoring Framework
We test PM tools with a standardized 30-task project across kanban, timeline, and list views, evaluating collaboration features for teams of 5-20 members.
Core PM
35 pts
Pricing
25 pts
Collaboration
20 pts
Usability
20 pts
Our Testing Process
01
Project Setup
Create a 30-task project with dependencies and milestones.
02
Team Testing
5-person team collaboration test over 2 weeks.
03
Feature Audit
Test views, automation, and reporting.
04
Scoring
Results aggregated and published.
1. Core Project Management
35 points max
Task management, views, and planning capabilities.
7
Task Management
Subtasks, dependencies, priorities, and custom fields.
7
Views Variety
Kanban, timeline/Gantt, list, calendar, mind-map views.
5
Templates & Workflows
Project templates and automated workflows.
4
Time Tracking
Built-in time tracking and reporting.
4
Goals & OKRs
Goal tracking and OKR management.
4
Docs & Wiki
Built-in documentation and knowledge base.
4
Resource Planning
Workload management and capacity planning.
2. Pricing
25 points max
Per-user pricing and feature access.
8
Free Tier
Users, projects, and features available for free.
6
Per-User Cost
Monthly cost per team member.
5
Feature Access
Key features available on lower tiers.
3
Guest Access
Free guest/viewer seats for stakeholders.
3
Enterprise
SSO, SCIM, and advanced admin controls.
3. Collaboration
20 points max
Team collaboration and communication features.
5
Real-Time Collab
Real-time editing, comments, and activity feeds.
4
Notifications
Smart notifications and @mention system.
4
Permissions
Granular role-based access control.
4
Integrations
Slack, GitHub, Figma, and 50+ integrations.
3
Reporting
Progress reports, burndown charts, and dashboards.
4. Usability
20 points max
Speed, design, and onboarding experience.
5
UI Speed
Load times, responsiveness, and keyboard shortcuts.
4
Mobile App
Native mobile app with feature parity.
4
API Quality
REST API for automation and custom integrations.
4
Onboarding
Setup speed and first-project experience.
3
Customization
Custom fields, statuses, and workspace theming.
Score Grading Scale
| Score Range | Grade | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 85 – 100 | Excellent | Best-in-class. Industry leader in this category. |
| 70 – 84 | Good | Strong performer for most use cases, minor gaps. |
| 55 – 69 | Satisfactory | Acceptable but falls behind leaders. Consider alternatives. |
| 0 – 54 | Needs Improvement | Significant limitations. Compare alternatives carefully. |
Independence & Transparency
Team-tested: Real teams use each tool for 2+ weeks.
No sponsored rankings: Scores are editorially independent.
Annual re-testing: Full evaluation annually.
Last methodology update: March 2026